Redemption & Salvation

Redemption and Salvation in the Early Church

The concepts of redemption and salvation are central to Christian theology, yet they are distinct in their scope and application. The early Church, drawing from the New Testament and the writings of the Church Fathers, developed a nuanced understanding of these doctrines. Redemption, as understood by early Christians, refers to the universal act of Christ’s atonement, which restored humanity’s broken relationship with God and made grace available to all. Salvation, however, requires individual cooperation with this grace through faith, good works, and a holy life. 

The New Testament presents redemption as Christ’s universal act of atonement, accomplished through His life, death, and resurrection. The term “redemption” (Greek: apolytrosis) denotes liberation from sin and its consequences, often framed as a ransom paid to free humanity from bondage to sin and death. For instance, in Romans 3:23-24, Paul writes, “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus.”¹ Here, redemption is a universal provision, available to all through Christ’s sacrifice, which restores humanity’s potential for communion with God.

The Gospel of John further emphasizes the universal scope of redemption: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). The phrase “the world” (kosmos) underscores that Christ’s redemptive work extends to all humanity, not a select group. Similarly, 1 Timothy 2:4-6 states that God “wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth,” with Christ giving Himself as a “ransom for all.”² These passages highlight that redemption is a universal gift, merited by Christ’s obedience and death, which cannot be earned by human effort.

Salvation, in contrast, is presented as the individual’s appropriation of this redemptive grace through faith and cooperation with God’s will. In Ephesians 2:8-9, Paul clarifies, “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.” Yet, the New Testament also emphasizes the necessity of active cooperation with grace. James 2:17 asserts, “Faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead,” suggesting that salvation involves living out one’s faith through good works and holiness.³ The process of salvation encompasses justification (being made righteous before God) and sanctification (growing in holiness), both of which require human response to divine grace.

The distinction between redemption and salvation is evident in the New Testament’s portrayal of Christ’s work as universally efficacious, yet not all individuals attain salvation. For example, in Matthew 7:13-14, Jesus warns, “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it.” This suggests that while redemption opens the door to salvation, personal choices and cooperation with grace determine whether one enters the “narrow gate” to eternal life.

Patristic Perspectives on Redemption and Salvation

The Church Fathers built upon the New Testament’s teachings, articulating the universal nature of redemption and the personal responsibility involved in salvation. They understood redemption as Christ’s victory over sin, death, and the devil, which restored humanity’s relationship with God and made grace universally available. Salvation, however, required an individual’s active participation through faith, repentance, and a life of virtue.

Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202) emphasized redemption as a recapitulation, whereby Christ, as the second Adam, restored what was lost through Adam’s sin. In Against Heresies, Irenaeus writes, “The Word of God, becoming man, summed up in Himself the whole human race, and by His obedience to the Father, He redeemed our disobedience.”⁴ For Irenaeus, Christ’s redemptive act was universal, applying to all humanity, but salvation required individuals to embrace this redemption through faith and obedience to God’s commandments.

Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373) further developed this idea in On the Incarnation. He argued that Christ’s incarnation and death restored humanity’s capacity for divine communion, which had been corrupted by sin. He states, “The Word took on a body capable of death, in order that, by partaking of the Word who is above all, it might become worthy of immortality.”⁵ Athanasius distinguished redemption as the objective restoration of humanity from salvation, which involves the subjective response of accepting Christ’s grace through baptism, faith, and a virtuous life.

Augustine of Hippo (c. 354–430) offered a nuanced perspective, emphasizing the universal availability of grace through Christ’s redemption while acknowledging human free will in salvation. In On the Spirit and the Letter, Augustine writes, “The grace of God through Jesus Christ our Lord is given to all men, but it is not efficacious unless it is received with a willing heart.”⁶ He stressed that while Christ’s death merited grace for all, salvation required cooperation through faith and good works, empowered by the Holy Spirit. Augustine’s distinction between redemption and salvation underscores that not all will be saved, as some reject the grace offered through Christ’s redemptive work.

The Church Fathers consistently taught that redemption was a universal act, accomplished once for all by Christ, while salvation was contingent upon individual cooperation with grace. This is evident in their emphasis on the sacraments, particularly baptism and the Eucharist, as means of participating in Christ’s redemption. For example, Cyril of Jerusalem (c. 313–386) in his Catechetical Lectures describes baptism as the entry point into salvation, where individuals receive the grace of redemption and are called to live a life of holiness.⁷

The Doctrine of Limited Atonement: A Later Innovation & Theological Novelty

The doctrine of limited atonement, which emerged during the Protestant Reformation, particularly within Calvinist theology, posits that Christ’s atoning sacrifice was intended only for the elect—those predestined for salvation—rather than for all humanity. This view, articulated by theologians like John Calvin and formalized in the Synod of Dort (1618–1619), contrasts sharply with the early Church’s understanding of redemption’s universal scope.

Scriptural Contradictions: Limited atonement contradicts several New Testament passages that affirm the universal extent of Christ’s redemptive work. For instance, 1 John 2:2 declares, “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.” Similarly, 2 Corinthians 5:19 states, “God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting people’s sins against them.” These verses underscore that Christ’s atonement is universal, making grace available to all, even if not all accept it. The doctrine of limited atonement restricts the scope of these passages, suggesting that Christ’s sacrifice was efficacious only for a predetermined group, which undermines the New Testament’s emphasis on God’s universal love and desire for all to be saved (1 Timothy 2:4).

Departure from Early Church Teaching: The early Church Fathers uniformly taught that Christ’s redemption was universal, applying to all humanity. For example, Gregory of Nazianzus (c. 329–390) wrote, “Christ is the ransom for all, the firstborn of all creation, offered for the salvation of all who will receive Him.”⁸ The idea that Christ’s atonement was limited to a select group would have been foreign to the patristic consensus, which emphasized the universal availability of grace while acknowledging human freedom to accept or reject it. The Church Fathers’ focus on free will and cooperation with grace, as seen in Augustine and others, directly opposes the deterministic framework of limited atonement.

Historical Novelty: Limited atonement emerged as a theological novelty in the 16th century, driven by the Reformation’s debates over predestination and grace. It was not taught by the early Church or supported by the ecumenical councils. The Council of Trent (1545–1563), responding to Protestant innovations, reaffirmed the universal scope of Christ’s redemption, stating, “The merit of Christ’s passion is sufficient for all, though it is applied to individuals through faith and the sacraments.”⁹ The absence of limited atonement in early Christian writings and its contradiction with Scripture highlight its status as a later development, rooted in specific theological controversies rather than apostolic tradition.

Conclusion

The early Church, grounded in the New Testament and developed through the writings of the Church Fathers, understood redemption as Christ’s universal act of atonement, which restored humanity’s relationship with God and made grace available to all. Salvation, however, required individual cooperation with this grace through faith, good works, and a holy life. The distinction between redemption’s universal scope and salvation’s personal appropriation was central to early Christian theology. The later doctrine of limited atonement, which restricts Christ’s atonement to the elect, contradicts both Scripture and the patristic consensus, representing a theological novelty that diverged from the early Church’s teaching. By affirming the universal efficacy of Christ’s redemption, the early Church upheld the hope that all could respond to God’s grace, while acknowledging the human responsibility to cooperate with it for salvation.

return to top ⇑