Redemptive Suffering in Catholic Theology: Participation in the Cross of Christ

I. What Is Redemptive Suffering?

Redemptive suffering in Catholic theology refers to the mystery by which the sufferings of the Christian, when freely united to Christ, become a means of spiritual transformation for the sufferer and a channel of grace for others. It does not mean that human suffering adds to Christ’s atonement, but that Christ graciously allows His members to participate in the application of His once-for-all sacrifice.

This doctrine is rooted in the biblical vision of union with Christ:

• “It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me” (Gal 2:20).
• “We are heirs with Christ—provided we suffer with him in order that we may also be glorified with him” (Rom 8:17).

Salvation in Scripture is not merely forensic or external; it is participatory. To belong to Christ is to share both His life and His cross.

II. Colossians 1:24: “What Is Lacking” in Christ’s Afflictions

St. Paul writes:

“Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the Church” (Col 1:24).

At first glance, this verse appears problematic. How can anything be “lacking” in Christ’s sufferings?

A. What Is 

Not

 Being Said

Paul cannot mean that Christ’s redemptive sacrifice was insufficient. Elsewhere he states unequivocally:

• “By a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are sanctified” (Heb 10:14).
• “Christ died once for all” (Rom 6:10).
• “We were reconciled to God by the death of his Son” (Rom 5:10).

Any interpretation that implies Christ’s sacrifice lacked redemptive power contradicts Paul’s own theology.

B. What 

Is

 Being Said

The key lies in Paul’s phrase: “for the sake of his body, that is, the Church.”

What is “lacking” is not the merit of Christ’s sacrifice, but its extension in time and space through His members. Christ the Head has suffered fully; Christ the Body must now enter into that suffering.

As Augustine later explained:

“Christ suffered everything that was necessary; but the Church must suffer what remains.”¹

Paul’s suffering is therefore ecclesial, not expiatory in itself. God has freely chosen to apply redemption through the lived obedience, suffering, and witness of His people.

III. Redemptive Suffering in the Economy of Salvation

A. Participation, Not Competition

Catholic theology emphasizes instrumental participation. God allows secondary causes—including human suffering—to cooperate in His saving work without rivaling His sovereignty.

Scripture repeatedly affirms this principle:

• “If we endure, we shall also reign with him” (2 Tim 2:12).
• “Whoever does not take up his cross and follow me is not worthy of me” (Mt 10:38).
• “Always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be manifested” (2 Cor 4:10).

Christ does not merely suffer for us; He invites us to suffer with Him.

B. Suffering as Transformative and Intercessory

Redemptive suffering has two primary dimensions:

1. Sanctification of the sufferer (Heb 12:10–11),
2. Intercession for others (Col 1:24; 2 Cor 1:6).

Paul explicitly connects his afflictions to the salvation of others:

• “If we are afflicted, it is for your comfort and salvation” (2 Cor 1:6).

Thus, suffering united to Christ becomes love poured out, not meaningless pain.

IV. Does Redemptive Suffering Imply Christ’s Death Was Insufficient?

A. Biblical Argument: Once-for-All, Yet Applied Over Time

Scripture holds two truths together:

• Christ’s sacrifice is objectively complete (Heb 9:12).
• Salvation is subjectively applied through history (Rom 8:23; Phil 3:10–12).

An analogy may help: Christ’s atonement is like an inexhaustible fountain; redemptive suffering is the channel by which its waters reach particular persons.

Paul himself frames it this way:

• “That I may know him… and share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death” (Phil 3:10).

To deny redemptive suffering would be to deny that the Christian truly participates in Christ’s life.

V. The Early Church: Suffering as Participation in Christ

A. The World of the Early Christians

Early Christians lived under:

• periodic persecution,
• social exclusion,
• real risk of martyrdom.

Suffering was not abstract theology—it was the daily cost of fidelity. Consequently, the Church understood suffering as normative to discipleship, not exceptional.

VI. Martyrdom as the Supreme Form of Redemptive Suffering

Early martyr accounts consistently interpret suffering as union with Christ’s passion.

The Martyrdom of Polycarp (c. AD 155) describes Polycarp’s death as:

“An offering and sacrifice acceptable to God.”²

Martyrdom was seen not as self-atonement, but as perfect conformity to Christ.

Ignatius of Antioch famously wrote:

“Let me be food for the beasts… then I shall truly be a disciple of Christ.”³

Ignatius does not believe his death replaces Christ’s sacrifice; rather, it manifests Christ’s victory in his own flesh.

VII. Tertullian and the Theology of Witness

Tertullian articulated the ecclesial fruitfulness of suffering:

“The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church.”⁴

This statement presumes:

• Christ’s sacrifice is complete,
• yet God chooses to spread the Gospel through suffering witness.

Martyrdom evangelizes precisely because it is participation, not addition.

VIII. Anthony the Great and the Desert Fathers

When persecution waned, ascetic suffering became the new arena of participation.

St. Anthony the Great embraced voluntary hardship as spiritual combat:

“Expect trials to your last breath.”⁵

The Desert Fathers understood suffering as:

• purification of the heart,
• detachment from sin,
• conformity to Christ’s obedience.

Abba Isaac taught:

“No one can draw near to God without trials.”⁶

Their theology assumed that sanctification requires sharing in Christ’s self-emptying (cf. Phil 2:5–8).

IX. Patristic Synthesis

The Fathers consistently taught:

• Christ’s sacrifice is unique and sufficient,
• Christian suffering is participatory and instrumental.

St. Cyprian of Carthage wrote:

“We are fellow-heirs with Christ if we suffer with Him.”⁷

St. Augustine summarized the doctrine:

“Christ suffers in His members until the end of the world.”⁸

This is not poetic exaggeration; it is ecclesiology rooted in the doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ.

X. Conclusion: The Cross Extended, Not Repeated

Catholic doctrine holds that:

1. Christ’s death is once-for-all and fully sufficient.
2. God freely wills that redemption be applied through the suffering obedience of His people.
3. Redemptive suffering is union, not supplementation.
4. Scripture, martyrdom accounts, and the Fathers unanimously affirm this participatory vision.
5. The Christian does not save himself—but is allowed to share in Christ’s saving love.

As Paul declares:

“I bear on my body the marks of Jesus” (Gal 6:17).

Redemptive suffering is the mystery by which love, freely embraced in pain, becomes a living extension of the Cross in history.

References & Footnotes

Scripture

Col 1:24; Rom 5:10; 6:10; 8:17, 23; 2 Cor 1:6; 4:10–12; Gal 2:20; 6:17; Phil 2:5–8; 3:10–12; Heb 9:12; 10:14; 12:10–11; Mt 10:38; 2 Tim 2:12.

Church Fathers & Early Sources

1. Augustine, Exposition on Psalm 62.
2. The Martyrdom of Polycarp, 14.
3. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Romans, 4.
4. Tertullian, Apology, 50.
5. Athanasius, Life of Anthony, 5.
6. John Cassian, Conferences, 5.
7. Cyprian of Carthage, On the Lapsed, 13.
8. Augustine, Sermon 341.

Catechism & Magisterial

• Catechism of the Catholic Church §§618, 1505, 1521.

return to top ⇑