Excommunication & Anathema

Excommunication in the Early Church

The doctrine and practice of excommunication—the exclusion of an individual from the communion of the Church—has deep roots in both Scripture and early Christian tradition. Far from being a punitive measure alone, excommunication was understood by the early Church as a medicinal act: a severe yet pastoral intervention aimed at correction, repentance, and restoration. Over time, as heresies, schisms, and liturgical conflicts arose, the Church developed clearer processes for administering excommunication, ultimately formalizing it in canon law.

Biblical Foundations of Excommunication

The roots of excommunication are found in both Jewish tradition and the New Testament. The Old Testament concept of being “cut off from the people” (cf. Leviticus 20:2–6) laid the groundwork for the Christian understanding of ecclesial separation. In the New Testament, several key passages provide a theological and procedural framework for the practice.

In Matthew 18:15–17, Jesus outlines a three-step process for dealing with unrepentant sin in the community: personal correction, group confrontation, and, if necessary, public exposure to the Church. “If he refuses to listen even to the Church,” Jesus says, “let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector” (v. 17)—a clear reference to exclusion from the community of believers.

St. Paul provides more explicit examples. In 1 Corinthians 5:1–5, Paul addresses a case of sexual immorality and commands the Church to “deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord” (v. 5). This is the clearest example of formal excommunication in Scripture, including the hope of repentance. Paul uses similar language in Titus 3:10–11 regarding divisive persons, and 2 Thessalonians 3:14 warns the faithful to “have nothing to do” with the disobedient.

The spiritual aim of excommunication is always corrective and redemptive: it seeks the repentance of the sinner and the preservation of ecclesial holiness (cf. 1 Corinthians 5:6–7).

Excommunication in the First Three Centuries

As the Church expanded through the Roman Empire, so too did challenges to unity. Excommunication became a necessary tool in preserving orthodoxy and order, particularly in response to heresy, schism, and moral scandal. In these early centuries, excommunication was generally administered locally by bishops, though emerging patterns would eventually lead to more centralized forms of discipline.

Apostolic Fathers and Ignatius of Antioch

St. Ignatius of Antioch (d. c. 110 A.D.), in his Letters, especially to the Smyrnaeans, emphasizes ecclesial unity under the bishop. He warns against separating from the bishop or Eucharistic assembly, implying exclusion for those who divide the Church. Though not yet using the term “excommunication” formally, Ignatius clearly reflects an early practice of ecclesial exclusion for schismatics and heretics.¹

The Shepherd of Hermas and Penance

The Shepherd of Hermas (mid-2nd century) discusses post-baptismal sin and the possibility of one-time repentance. While not explicitly about excommunication, the work reveals growing anxiety over reintegration of lapsed or sinful Christians, hinting at early exclusionary practices that prefigured formal excommunication and reconciliation.²

The Montanist and Gnostic Crises

The Montanist and Gnostic heresies prompted early episcopal responses that included excommunication. Montanus and his followers, claiming prophetic inspiration, were condemned by bishops in Asia Minor for undermining episcopal authority and introducing new revelations. They were effectively cut off from Church communion in the late second century.

Likewise, prominent Gnostic teachers like Valentinus and Marcion (who rejected the Old Testament and edited the canon) were denounced and excommunicated in Rome by bishops such as Pope St. Pius I (c. 140–155) and Pope St. Anicetus (c. 157–168), marking the Roman Church’s early role in enforcing doctrinal boundaries.³

Easter Controversies and Pope Victor I

One of the earliest documented uses of formal excommunication at the level of universal authority occurred under Pope Victor I (r. 189–199) during the Quartodeciman Controversy. Churches in Asia Minor observed Easter on 14 Nisan (in line with Jewish Passover), while Rome and others celebrated on Sunday. Victor threatened excommunication for the dissenting churches. Although his stance provoked criticism (notably from Irenaeus of Lyons), it marked the first attempt by a bishop of Rome to impose disciplinary unity across the Church through excommunication.⁴

The Use of Anathema

Closely related to excommunication is the concept of anathema, a term derived from the Greek ἀνάθεμα, meaning “accursed” or “devoted to destruction.” In the Septuagint, anathema referred to something or someone placed under God’s judgment (cf. Joshua 6:17–18). In the New Testament, Paul uses the term in Galatians 1:8–9: “If anyone preaches a gospel contrary to what you received, let him be anathema.”

In the early Church, “anathema” came to denote a more solemn, spiritual form of exclusion, often reserved for formal heretics. While excommunication could be temporary and medicinal, anathema implied a more severe, possibly permanent, severance from the Church unless repentance occurred.

The earliest formal use of anathema in Church documents can be found in synodal letters of the second and third centuries, where bishops anathematized those denying core tenets of the faith. St. Hippolytus (d. c. 235) lists several heretical beliefs in his Refutation of All Heresies and calls for their rejection and exclusion from Church communion. By the time of the First Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.), the term anathema was used to describe those who rejected the divinity of Christ as taught in the Creed.⁵

Toward Formalization: Third and Fourth Centuries

By the third century, excommunication began to develop into a more structured ecclesial process, especially as the Church faced internal schisms and Roman persecution.

Cyprian of Carthage and the Lapsi

St. Cyprian (d. 258), bishop of Carthage, played a central role in formalizing ecclesiastical discipline. During the Decian persecution (249–251), many Christians lapsed—denying Christ to save their lives. After the persecution, debate raged over whether and how these lapsi should be readmitted. Cyprian insisted on episcopal oversight and a penitential process before reconciliation, and he excommunicated those who bypassed episcopal authority (including those who sought false reconciliation through schismatic priests like Novatian). His letters reveal an evolving system of formal discipline, emphasizing both justice and mercy.⁶

The Novatian Schism and Rome

Following this, Novatian, a Roman priest, rejected the leniency shown to the lapsi and formed a rigorist sect, claiming the Church could not forgive grave sins after baptism. Pope Cornelius (r. 251–253), supported by Cyprian, excommunicated Novatian and upheld the Church’s authority to absolve even grave sins. This incident is notable for its strong episcopal assertion of ecclesial unity and mercy, as well as Rome’s growing central role in adjudicating theological and moral disputes.⁷

Conclusion

By the fourth century, particularly after the legalization of Christianity under Constantine, excommunication became a formal and canonically regulated practice. The Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.) codified procedures for dealing with clergy and laity who violated core doctrines or ecclesial discipline. It used the term anathema in its canons and attached theological consequences to excommunication—denial of Eucharist, barring from Christian burial, and loss of communion with the universal Church.

Excommunication and anathema would continue to evolve through ecumenical councils and papal decrees, becoming cornerstones of ecclesial discipline in both East and West. But their foundation—rooted in Scripture, articulated by early bishops like Ignatius, Cyprian, and Pope Victor, and applied in real historical crises—remains grounded in the Church’s responsibility to preserve the purity, unity, and holiness of the Body of Christ.

Footnotes

return to top ⇑