Contents:

The Church’s Response to Heresy: The Apostolic Age (c. 30–100 A.D.)

The Apostolic Church, guided by the authority of the Twelve Apostles and especially Paul, dealt with heresy as a matter of immediate pastoral urgency and spiritual danger. The New Testament itself provides evidence of numerous false teachings that arose within the lifetime of the Apostles.  Some of the early heresies Paul and the apostles faced included:

  1. Judaizing Heresy – Some early Christians insisted that Gentile converts must follow Mosaic Law, especially circumcision, to be saved. Paul confronted this directly in Galatians:
    “A man is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ” (Gal 2:16).
    Paul condemned this teaching as a distortion of the gospel (Gal 1:6–9).
  2. Proto-Gnosticism – Paul warned against speculative myths, genealogies, and false knowledge (gnosis) (1 Tim 1:4, 6:20). This early Gnosticism was likely in its infancy, marked by dualism (spirit good, matter evil) and secret revelation.
  3. Docetism – The belief that Christ only appeared to be human and to suffer. John likely addressed this in his first epistle:
    “Every spirit that does not confess Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is not of God” (1 John 4:2–3).

The Apostles responded with exhortations to hold fast to the “tradition” passed down (2 Thess 2:15), the authority of apostolic teaching (Acts 2:42), and warnings against “wolves in sheep’s clothing” (Matt 7:15; Acts 20:29–30). Paul invoked his apostolic authority and commissioned others (like Timothy and Titus) to guard the deposit of faith (1 Tim 6:20).  The motivation was not merely fear of schism, but concern for the integrity of the faith “once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3). Heresy was seen not as a different opinion, but a distortion of the saving message entrusted to the Church.

The Apostolic Fathers (c. 95–150 A.D.)

After the death of the last Apostle (traditionally John), a second generation of Christian leaders—often disciples of the Apostles—carried forward the Church’s defense of orthodoxy. These include Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, Polycarp of Smyrna, and The Didache’s anonymous authors.  Some of the heresies these Apostolic Fathers faced included:

  1. Docetism (continued) – Ignatius vigorously opposed those who denied that Christ had truly suffered and died:
    “He suffered truly, as also He truly raised Himself” (Letter to the Trallians, 9).
  2. Early Gnosticism – This began taking more developed forms, often incorporating Christian terminology but redefining it. It rejected the Creator as the true God, dismissed the resurrection of the body, and emphasized salvation through secret knowledge.

Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35–107) wrote seven letters on his way to martyrdom in Rome. He stressed unity with the bishop as a sign of orthodoxy and viewed schism as spiritually dangerous:  “Where the bishop is, there let the people be, even as where Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church” (Smyrnaeans, 8).  He identified false teachers as those who avoided the Eucharist because they denied Christ’s real flesh (Smyrnaeans, 6–7).  Polycarp of Smyrna (c. 69–155) combated Gnostic ideas in his letter to the Philippians and called heretical teachings “the firstborn of Satan.”

The response of the Christian community to heresy became increasingly structured, emphasizing the visible unity of the Church through bishops, adherence to apostolic teaching, and the formation of a proto-canon of authoritative writings. The word “heresy” (from Greek hairesis, “choice”) took on the sense of a willful departure from the apostolic rule of faith.

The Pre-Nicene Fathers (c. 150–300 A.D.)

This period witnessed the flourishing of theological responses to full-blown Gnosticism, Marcionism, Montanism, and Modalism, among others. As heresies became more sophisticated, so too did the Church’s theological and institutional response.  This time period saw a burst of Christological heresies including:

  1. Gnosticism – Advocated a dualistic worldview, denial of the Incarnation, rejection of the Old Testament God, and secret salvific knowledge. Prominent teachers included Valentinus, Basilides, and Carpocrates.
  2. Marcionism – Founded by Marcion of Sinope (c. 85–160), this system rejected the Old Testament entirely, claiming the God of Israel was a lesser, evil deity. Marcion created his own canon, eliminating Jewish elements and retaining only a modified version of Luke and some Pauline epistles.
  3. Montanism – A prophetic movement led by Montanus, claiming the imminent end of the world and continuing revelation from the Holy Spirit that superseded Church authority.
  4. Modalism (Sabellianism) – Denied the real distinctions between Father, Son, and Spirit, claiming they were merely modes or manifestations of one divine person.

Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202) in his work Against Heresies systematically dismantled Gnostic teachings, emphasizing apostolic succession, the unity of Scripture, and the incarnation of Christ as truly God and truly man.

“Where the Church is, there is the Spirit of God; and where the Spirit of God is, there is the Church and all grace” (Against Heresies, 3.24.1).

Tertullian (c. 155–240): A fierce opponent of heresies, he coined the term Trinitas (Trinity) and emphasized Scripture’s clarity when read within the “rule of faith.” Though he later joined Montanism, his earlier works, such as Prescription Against Heretics, argued that heretics have no right to appeal to Scripture apart from the Church.  Hippolytus of Rome (c. 170–235) wrote Refutation of All Heresies, categorizing and analyzing dozens of heretical groups. He particularly opposed Sabellianism and defended a Logos theology that affirmed both the unity and distinction within the Godhead. Origen of Alexandria (c. 184–253) contributed significantly to biblical exegesis and the fight against Gnosticism, emphasizing the goodness of creation, the unity of Scripture, and the centrality of Christ.

The Church’s motivation was not fear or insecurity but fidelity. Heresies were perceived as distortions of the faith entrusted once for all to the saints (Jude 3). As heresies increasingly claimed legitimacy and gained followers, the Church solidified its authority structures:

  • Apostolic Succession: Irenaeus argued that true doctrine was preserved in churches founded by the Apostles and led by their successors.
  • Canon Formation: The challenge of Marcion and Gnostics accelerated the need to define authoritative Scripture.
  • Creeds: The “Rule of Faith” emerged in baptismal formulas, eventually developing into the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds.
  • Councils and Excommunication: Heretics were expelled after debate, not merely for political reasons but to preserve doctrinal purity (cf. Titus 3:10).

Conclusion

Across the first three centuries, the Church’s response to heresy developed organically, rooted in fidelity to apostolic teaching and shaped by the context of growing theological challenges. From the New Testament warnings against false teachers to Irenaeus’ structured defense of apostolic succession and Scripture, the Church’s strategy matured in both theological depth and institutional structure. The primary concern was not political control but spiritual preservation of the gospel message. Heresy was viewed as a spiritual threat to the unity, identity, and salvific mission of the Church.

Footnotes

  1. The Holy Bible, ESV (Crossway, 2001), Gal 1:6–9; 2:16.
  2. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6–8, in The Apostolic Fathers, ed. Bart D. Ehrman (Loeb Classical Library, 2003).
  3. Polycarp, Letter to the Philippians, 7.
  4. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 3.1.1, 3.3.1, 3.24.1, trans. Dominic J. Unger (CIMA Publishing, 1992).
  5. Tertullian, Prescription Against Heretics, 7, in Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 3.
  6. Hippolytus, Refutation of All Heresies, Preface.
  7. Origen, De Principiis, trans. Butterworth (SPCK, 1966).
  8. J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines, 5th ed. (Continuum, 2000).
  9. Henry Chadwick, The Early Church (Penguin, 1993), pp. 33–74.
  10. Jaroslav Pelikan, The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, Vol. 1 (University of Chicago Press, 1971), pp. 105–147.

return to top ⇑

Bible Verses:

The Gospel of Matthew 18:17
If the member refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if the offender refuses to listen even to the church, let such a one be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.

The Gospel of Matthew 24:10-13
Then many will fall away, and they will betray one another and hate one another. 11 And many false prophets will arise and lead many astray. 12 And because of the increase of lawlessness, the love of many will grow cold. 13 But the one who endures to the end will be saved.

Galatians 1:8-9:
“But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.”

2 Peter 2:1:
“But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction.”

1 Timothy 4:1:
“Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons.”

1 Corinthians 1:10
Now I appeal to you, brothers and sisters, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you be in agreement and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same purpose.

Hebrews 13:7-9, 17
Remember your leaders, those who spoke the word of God to you; consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith. 8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever. 9 Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings;

2 Thessalonians 3:6
Now we command you, beloved, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, to keep away from believers who are living in idleness and not according to the tradition that they received from us.

1 Timothy 3:15
But if I should be delayed, you should know how to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of truth.

2 Peter 1:20
First of all you must understand this, that no prophecy of scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation,

2 Peter 3:15-16
So also our beloved brother Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other scriptures.

return to top ⇑

Church Father Quotes:

Ignatius of Antioch (35-107 A.D.)

“Be not deceived, my brethren: If anyone follows a maker of schism [i.e., is a schismatic], he does not inherit the kingdom of God; if anyone walks in strange doctrine [i.e., is a heretic], he has no part in the passion [of Christ]. Take care, then, to use one Eucharist, so that whatever you do, you do according to God: For there is one flesh of our Lord Jesus Christ, and one cup in the union of his blood; one altar, as there is one bishop, with the presbytery and my fellow servants, the deacons” (Letter to the Philadelphians 3:3–4:1 [A.D. 110]).

Justin Martyr (100-165 A.D.)

“We have been taught that Christ is the first-begotten of God, and we have declared him to be the Logos of which all mankind partakes [John 1:9]. Those, therefore, who lived according to reason [Greek, logos] were really Christians, even though they were thought to be atheists, such as, among the Greeks, Socrates, Heraclitus, and others like them. . . . Those who lived before Christ but did not live according to reason [logos] were wicked men, and enemies of Christ, and murderers of those who did live according to reason [logos], whereas those who lived then or who live now according to reason [logos] are Christians. Such as these can be confident and unafraid” (First Apology 46 [A.D. 151]).

Irenaeus of Lyons (130-202 A.D.)

“In the Church God has placed apostles, prophets, teachers, and every other working of the Spirit, of whom none of those are sharers who do not conform to the Church, but who defraud themselves of life by an evil mind and even worse way of acting. Where the Church is, there is the Spirit of God; where the Spirit of God is, there is the Church and all grace” (Against Heresies 3:24:1 [A.D. 189]).

“[The spiritual man] shall also judge those who give rise to schisms, who are destitute of the love of God, and who look to their own special advantage rather than to the unity of the Church; and who for trifling reasons, or any kind of reason which occurs to them, cut in pieces and divide the great and glorious body of Christ, and so far as in them lies, destroy it—men who prate of peace while they give rise to war, and do in truth strain out a gnat, but swallow a camel. For they can bring about no ‘reformation’ of enough importance to compensate for the evil arising from their schism” (ibid., 4:33:7–8).

“All these heretics are of much later date than the Bishops to whom the Apostles handed over the Churches; this fact I pointed out most carefully in the third book. It is of necessity, then, that these heretics, because they are blind to truth, walk in various and devious paths; on this account the vestiges of their doctrine are scattered about without agreement or connection.
The path of those who belong to the Church, however, goes around the whole world; for it has the firm tradition of the Apostles, enabling us to see that the faith of all is one and the same.” – Against Heresies 5:20:1

Origen of Alexandria (184-253 A.D.)

“If someone from this people wants to be saved, let him come into this house so that he may be able to attain his salvation. . . . Let no one, then, be persuaded otherwise, nor let anyone deceive himself: Outside of this house, that is, outside of the Church, no one is saved; for, if anyone should go out of it, he is guilty of his own death” (Homilies on Joshua 3:5 [A.D. 250]).

Cyprian of Carthage (200-258 A.D.)

“Whoever is separated from the Church and is joined to an adulteress [a schismatic church] is separated from the promises of the Church, nor will he that forsakes the Church of Christ attain to the rewards of Christ. . . .  He cannot have God for his Father who has not the Church for his mother” (The Unity of the Catholic Church 6, 1st ed. [A.D. 251]).

“Let them not think that the way of life or salvation exists for them, if they have refused to obey the bishops and priests, since the Lord says in the book of Deuteronomy: ‘And any man who has the insolence to refuse to listen to the priest or judge, whoever he may be in those days, that man shall die’ [Deut. 17:12]. And then, indeed, they were killed with the sword . . . but now the proud and insolent are killed with the sword of the Spirit, when they are cast out from the Church. For they cannot live outside, since there is only one house of God, and there can be no salvation for anyone except in the Church” (Letters 61[4]:4 [A.D. 253]).

“When we say, ‘Do you believe in eternal life and the remission of sins through the holy Church?’ we mean that remission of sins is not granted except in the Church” (ibid., 69[70]:2 [A.D. 253]).

“Peter himself, showing and vindicating the unity, has commanded and warned us that we cannot be saved except by the one only baptism of the one Church. He says, ‘In the ark of Noah a few, that is, eight souls, were saved by water. Similarly, baptism will in like manner save you” [1 Peter 3:20-21]. In how short and spiritual a summary has he set forth the sacrament of unity! In that baptism of the world in which its ancient wickedness was washed away, he who was not in the ark of Noah could not be saved by water. Likewise, neither can he be saved by baptism who has not been baptized in the Church” (ibid., 73[71]:11).

“[O]utside the Church there is no Holy Spirit, sound faith moreover cannot exist, not alone among heretics, but even among those who are established in schism” (Treatise on Rebaptism 10 [A.D. 256]).

Firmilian of Caesarea (Died 269 A.D.)

“And other heretics as well, if they have parted themselves from the Church, can have nothing to do with power and grace, since all power and grace is settled in the Church, where preside presbyters, who possess the power of both baptizing and imposing of hands, and of ordaining.” – Letter to Cyprian (Written in 255 A.D.)

Lactantius (250-325 A.D.)

“It is, therefore, the Catholic Church alone which retains true worship. . . . Whoever does not enter there or whoever does not go out from there, he is a stranger to the hope of life and salvation. . . . Because, however, all the various groups of heretics are confident that they are the Christians and think that theirs is the Catholic Church, let it be known that this is the true Church, in which there is confession and penance and which takes a health-promoting care of the sins and wounds to which the weak flesh is subject” (Divine Institutes 4:30:11–13 [A.D. 307]).

Hilary of Poitiers (310-367 A.D.)

“The Church, instituted by the Lord and confirmed by the Apostles is one and universal; but the frantic folly of diverse impious sects have cut themselves off from her. It cannot be denied that this tearing asunder of the faith has arisen from poor intelligence which twists what it reads to conform to its opinion, rather than adjusting its opinion to the meaning of what is read.” –The Trinity, Against the Arian Heresy 7:4 (Written 355 A.D.)

“All heretics, therefore, come against the Church; but while all the heretics can conquer each other, they can win nothing for themselves… One heresy struggles against the teaching of another, which the faith of the Church has already condemned -for there is nothing which the heretics hold in common-and the result is that they affirm our faith while fighting among themselves.” -The Trinity, Against the Arian Heresy 7:4 (Written 355 A.D.)

“They are excluded from the promises of the Gospel, who have no faith in those promises; and the crime of perverse understanding utterly destroys hope. That you believe what is unknown deserves not so much pardon as it does reward, because the greatest recompense of faith is to have hope in what you do not know. But it is absolute madness of a wicked kind, to either not believe what is understood or to corrupt the meaning of what ought to be believed.” –The Trinity, Against the Arians 8:10 (Written 355 A.D.)

Basil the Great (330-379 A.D.)

“It seemed best to men of former times -Cyprian, Firmillian, and their colleagues, I mean- to subject all of these, whether Cathari, Encratites, or Hydroparastates, to a like judgment, because their separation had been initiated through schism, and because those who separated themselves from the Church, no longer had in themselves the grace of the Holy Spirit, when His being imparted ceased through their breach in continuity. For those who first withdrew and had their ordination from the Fathers and, through imposition of hands, had the spiritual charism, but, having broken away, they became laymen, having power to neither baptize nor ordain…” –Letter to Amphilochius, Bishop of Iconium 188:1 (Written 374 A.D.)

Rufinus of Aquileia (344-411 A.D.)

“As for me, I declare in Christ’s name that I never held, nor ever will hold, any other faith but that which I have set forth above, that is, the faith which is held by the Church of Rome, by that of Alexandria, and by my own church of Aquileia; and which is also preached at Jerusalem; and if there is any one who believes otherwise, whoever he may be, let him be Anathema. But those who through mere ill will and malice engender dissensions and offenses among their brethren, and cause them to stumble, shall give account of it in the day of judgment.”-Apology of Rufinus to Anastasius, Bishop of Rome, chap 8 (Written 400 A.D.)

Pope Innocent I (Died 417 A.D.)

“To presbyters and deacons, and all the clergy and people of the Church of Constantinople, the brethren beloved who are subject to the bishop John (Chrysostom), greetings. . . From the letters of your love which you have sent by the hands of Germanus the presbyter, and Casianus the deacon, I have studied with anxious care the scene of calamity which you have placed before my eyes. . . Not only therefore do we say that these ought not to be followed, but rather that they should be condemned among heretical and schismatic decrees, as was formerly done in the Council of Sardica by the bishops who were before us.” –The Letter of Pope Innocent I to John Chrysostom (Written ca 416 A.D.)

Jerome of Stridon (347-420 A.D.)

“Heretics bring sentence upon themselves since they by their own choice withdraw from the Church, a withdrawal which, since they are aware of it, constitutes damnation. Between heresy and schism there is this difference: that heresy involves perverse doctrine, while schism separates one from the Church on account of disagreement with the bishop. Nevertheless, there is no schism which does not trump up a heresy to justify its departure from the Church” (Commentary on Titus 3:10–11 [A.D. 386]).

Augustine of Hippo (354-430 A.D.)

“We believe also in the holy Church, that is, the Catholic Church. For heretics violate the faith itself by a false opinion about God; schismatics, however, withdraw from fraternal love by hostile separations, although they believe the same things we do. Consequently, neither heretics nor schismatics belong to the Catholic Church; not heretics, because the Church loves God; and not schismatics, because the Church loves neighbor” (Faith and the Creed 10:21 [A.D. 393]).

“I do not hesitate to put the Catholic catechumen, burning with divine love, before a baptized heretic. Even within the Catholic Church herself we put the good catechumen ahead of the wicked baptized person . . . For Cornelius, even before his baptism, was filled up with the Holy Spirit [Acts 10:44–48], while Simon [Magus], even after his baptism, was puffed up with an unclean spirit [Acts 8:13–19]” (On Baptism, Against the Donatists4:21[28]).

“The apostle Paul said, ‘As for a man that is a heretic, after admonishing him once or twice, have nothing more to do with him’ [Titus 3:10]. But those who maintain their own opinion, however false and perverted, without obstinate ill will, especially those who have not originated the error of bold presumption, but have received it from parents who had been led astray and had lapsed . . . those who seek the truth with careful industry and are ready to be corrected when they have found it, are not to be rated among heretics” (Letters 43:1 [A.D. 412]).

“Whoever is separated from this Catholic Church, by this single sin of being separated from the unity of Christ, no matter how estimable a life he may imagine he is living, shall not have life, but the wrath of God rests upon him” (ibid., 141:5).

John Cassian (360-435 A.D.)

“Thus also heresies in the churches bear some likeness to that hydra which the poets’ imagination invented; for they too hiss against us with deadly tongues; and they too cast forth their deadly poison, and spring up again when their heads are cut off. . . For these shoots of an unnatural seed are no new thing in the churches. The harvest of the Lord’s field has always had to put up with burrs and briars, and in it the shoots of choking tares have constantly sprung up. For hence have arisen the Ebionites, Sabellians, Arians, as well as Eunomians and Macedonians, and Photinians and Apollinarians, and all the other tares of the churches, and thistles which destroy the fruits of good faith.” -On the Incarnation Book I: Chapter 1-2

“And of these the earliest was Ebion, who while over-anxious about asserting our Lord’s humanity robbed it of its union with Divinity. But after him the schism of Sabellius burst forth out of reaction against the above mentioned heresy, and as he declared that there was no distinction between the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. . . Next after him whom we have mentioned there followed the blasphemy of Arian perversity, which, in order to avoid the appearance of confounding the Sacred Persons, declared that there were different and dissimilar substances in the Trinity. . . Macedonius also blaspheming against the Holy Ghost with unpardonable wickedness, while allowing that the Father and the Son were of one substance, termed the Holy Ghost a creature, and so sinned against the entire Divinity. . . But Photinus, though allowing that Jesus who was born of the Virgin was God, yet erred in his notion that His Godhead began with the beginning of His manhood; while Apollinaris through inaccurately conceiving the union of God and man wrongly believed that He was without a human soul. . . And so one after another out of reaction against heresies they give rise to heresies, and all teach things different from each other, but equally opposed to the faith.” -On the Incarnation Book I: Chapter 2

“For Leporius, then a monk, now a presbyter, who followed the teaching or rather the evil deeds of Pelagius, as we said above, and was among the earliest and greatest champions of the aforesaid heresy in Gaul, was admonished by us and corrected by God. . .
This confession of his therefore, which was the faith of all Catholics was approved of by all the Bishops of Africa, whence he wrote, and by all those of Gaul, to whom he wrote. Nor has there ever been anyone who quarrelled with this faith, without being guilty of unbelief: for to deny what is right and proved is to confess what is wrong.” –On the Incarnation Book I: Chapter 4-6

“Why then, you heretic, did you not in this way quote the whole and entire passage which you had read? . . . Why then, you heretic, did you not in this way quote what you had read in the Apostle, entire and unmutilated? But you insert part, and omit part; and garble the words of truth in order that you may be able to build up your false notions by your wicked act. I see who was your master. We must believe that you had his instruction, whose example you are following. For so the devil in the gospel when tempting the Lord said: If You are the Son of God, cast Yourself down. For it is written that He shall give His angels charge concerning You to keep You in all Your ways. Luke 4:9-10 And when he had said this, he left out the context and what belongs to it.” -On the Incarnation of Christ Book VII: Chapter 16 (Written in 429 A.D.)

Isidore of Pelusium (360-440 A.D.)

“Just as the fishermen hide the hook with bait and covertly hook the fish, similarly, the crafty allies of the heresies cover their evil teachings and corrupt understanding with pietism and hook the more simple, bringing them to spiritual death.” -Letter to Timothy the Reader, Patrologia Graeca (PG) 78:252.

Fulgentius of Ruspe (465-530 A.D.)

“Anyone who receives the sacrament of baptism, whether in the Catholic Church or in a heretical or schismatic one, receives the whole sacrament; but salvation, which is the strength of the sacrament, he will not have, if he has had the sacrament outside the Catholic Church [and remains in deliberate schism]. He must therefore return to the Church, not so that he might receive again the sacrament of baptism, which no one dare repeat in any baptized person, but so that he may receive eternal life in Catholic society, for the obtaining of which no one is suited who, even with the sacrament of baptism, remains estranged from the Catholic Church” (The Rule of Faith 43 [A.D. 524]).

return to top ⇑