Papal Infallibility

The doctrine of Papal Infallibility is often misconstrued by both Catholics and non-Catholics. It’s important to understand that infallibility is distinct from revelation and inspiration. While revelation and inspiration involve the unveiling of new truths to the Church, infallibility serves as a safeguard against error when further defining or clarifying truths that have already been revealed by God.  Neither should Infallibility be confused with impeccability, as it does not imply that Popes or clergy are without sin or morally flawless in their personal lives. It also does not guarantee that a Pope will possess a perfect understanding of orthodoxy or refrain from personally endorsing erroneous teachings. Additionally, infallibility does not ensure prudence in a Pope’s decisions, disciplinary actions, or unofficial comments on matters of faith and morals. Private theological opinions held by a Pope are not considered infallible; only solemnly defined teachings are regarded as such, and even then, further clarification may be required. The first six Ecumenical Councils provide a prime example of this process in their efforts to define Christ’s divinity and personhood.

In other words, the Pope and the Church do not possess omniscience, but by the will of God, the Church is safeguarded from error, allowing her to faithfully transmit the teachings of the apostles. The infallibility of a papal pronouncement arises only when it is made “ex cathedra” or “from the chair” of Peter. For a declaration to be considered infallible, the Pope must intend to speak with his full authority as the supreme teacher on matters of faith and morals. Such declarations are typically made in response to challenges to established doctrines.

The underlying principle of this doctrine is not only theologically sound, but when carefully considered, is a theological necessity; Christ established His Church as a visible society, with the intention of it being one, universal body characterized by unity in faith, governance, and worship. To ensure this unity, He granted the Apostles and their successors the authority to teach, govern, and administer the sacraments and liturgy. This authority necessitates the Church’s infallibility in her objective and definitive teachings concerning faith and morals, while acknowledging that individual believers are not infallible in their subjective interpretations of these teachings.  Historically, it is evident that bishops have held differing interpretations of Scripture, Tradition, and even previously defined doctrines. To maintain unity, Christ foresaw the need for a final authority in matters of theology. Thus, He instituted the Successor of Peter as the head of the Magisterium to ensure the integrity and accuracy of Church doctrine, providing a unifying and authoritative voice in matters of faith and morals.

The authority and discernment required to establish the canon of the Bible, a foundational aspect of Christianity, is sometimes overlooked by believers. It is important to recognize that the Bible owes its existence to the infallible Church, which provided guidance in determining which books should be included. Without the presence of an infallible Church, Christians would lack certainty regarding the inspiration of each book and the completeness of their collection. The Bible itself contains verses that suggest the existence of a Church entrusted with the authority to infallibly teach the revealed truth of Christ.  In Matthew 28:18-20 and Mark 16:15-16, Jesus gives a solemn commission to the Apostles, bestowing upon them the authority to teach and baptize all nations. Jesus instructed his apostles to preach everything he taught (Matt. 28:19–20) and promised them the protection of the Holy Spirit to “guide you into all the truth” (John 16:13), implying a greater understanding over time. Paul calls the Church the “pillar and bulwark of the truth” (1 Tim. 3:15). This description supports the understanding that the Church is infallible since it would be misleading to apply such a description to a fallible institution.

In addition, Jesus prays that his disciples, the Church, “be one,” as he and the other Father “are one” (John 17:20–23). Unity is only possible if there is a recognized authority to make definitive proclamations on the faith. Hebrews 13:7 and 17 calls us to obey this authority. Just as authority is necessary for maintaining the unity of faith, Infallibility is necessary for upholding the truths essential to Christianity. Without it, there would be no finality to controversy within the Church.  The history of heresies and Protestant sects demonstrates the need for an infallible authority capable of decisively pronouncing judgments regarding doctrines like the Trinity and Incarnation.

The ultimate promise of the Church’s infallibility is fulfilled in Matthew 16:18, where Christ promises that the gates of hell will not prevail against it. This promise denies the possibility of the Church erring in its dogmatic definitions. In addition, when Matthew 16:18-19 is read in view of Isaiah 22:21-23, it indicates that Peter and his successors would be the visible head of the Church with the power to make infallible pronouncements on matters of faith and morals. In Luke 22:31-32, Jesus tells Peter, “Simon, Simon, behold, Satan demanded to have you, that he might sift you like wheat, but I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail. And when you have turned again, strengthen your brothers” implying Peter’s privileged position. At the Council of Jerusalem, the Apostles claimed to speak in the name and with the authority of the Holy Spirit, making apparent their confidence in an infallible Divine guidance in their declarations.

Although the development and formal definition of papal infallibility as a doctrine took place over centuries, culminating in the First Vatican Council in 1870, the historical evidence and interpretations of the early Church and the Church Fathers contribute to the theological foundation upon which this doctrine was later established. During the early centuries, although there was no explicit discussion of ecclesiastical infallibility, the Church operated on the assumption of its infallibility in matters of doctrine. The orthodox teachers of that time firmly believed in the Church’s infallibility, while those who contradicted its teaching were regarded as representatives of Antichrist and were excommunicated.

Prominent figures like St. Ignatius of Antioch and St. Polycarp displayed intolerance toward error and firmly believed in the divine guidance of the episcopal body, which implies infallibility. St. Irenaeus argued against the Gnostics, relying on the principle of a living ecclesiastical authority, for which he virtually claimed infallibility. Tertullian ridiculed the idea that the universal teaching of the Church could be wrong, emphasizing the role of the Holy Spirit as the teacher of truth. St. Cyprian compared the Church to an incorruptible virgin, highlighting its integrity.

A Note on Papal Corruption:

Accusations of corruption in the Church is nothing new nor denied. However, it’s important to consider the historical context in which the papacy has operated. The Church has faced numerous challenges throughout its history, and it is unfair to judge the actions of past popes solely through a modern lens. While some popes may have faced accusations of corruption, others have been recognized for their virtues, personal holiness, and commitment to the Gospel. Many of the popes in the early centuries died as martyrs for the faith. It is important to acknowledge the contributions of those popes who have strived to lead the Church with integrity.

Although periods of widespread corruption have been known in the Church, corruption itself is something that has been present within the Church since it’s inception, even amongst the Apostles. Most of Paul’s letters were written in response to corruption within the church. The Catholic Church has undergone significant reforms throughout history to address issues of corruption and abuse. Reforms such as the Council of Trent and the Second Vatican Council demonstrate the Church’s commitment to addressing internal problems.

In fact, the Catholic Church’s enduring presence for over two millennia can be seen as a testament to its ability to withstand and overcome challenges. In that time, the Catholic Church has made significant contributions to society in areas such as art, music, philosophy, and social justice. Despite accusations of corruption, the Catholic Church has a long history of engaging in charitable activities, such as providing education, healthcare, and relief to those in need. The Catholic Church is currently the largest charitable organization in the world, bar none. No other organization even comes close, or even has the man power to possibly match what the Church has been able to accomplish.

While the papacy represents the highest authority in the Church, it is crucial to recognize that individual popes are fallible human beings. There is no doubt that certain behavior is inexcusable and, in some cases, downright contemptuous, but the Church has established various structures and processes to hold clergy accountable, including the establishment of tribunals and the implementation of stricter guidelines for the handling of misconduct allegations. Reform is a constant endeavor.

return to top ⇑